Saturday, August 30, 2014

Related Articles Apple and Samsung to try one last time to reach a compromise in the form of amicab


Najmedializovanejší lawsuit last week dispute car food tray companies Apple and Samsung, on Friday ended with a win for Apple. Samsung is obliged to pay him $ 1,049,343,540, what jury decided unanimously.
Samsung is guilty of willful infringement of software and design patents related to iOS, original iPhone and iPhone 3G. Samsung's infringement allegations "trade dress" iPad and antitrust court proceedings were dismissed. This is probably the only decision that can juhokórejcov enjoy. None of the six accused, which Samsung countered Apple, car food tray in fact, were not considered relevant. Amount that Apple was almost total expected trojásobne higher, but the unanimous verdict of the jury, and more than a billion sum is definitely a clear win for Apple. Samsung car food tray appeals against the decision.
Breached three software patents, which can be found in iOS devices. Firstly, it is patent on touch gestures car food tray and touch of distinction between one and two fingers. Then there is the effect of "bounce back" a patent on the use of two fingers to approximation web, photo or document.
Apple on what mattered more were design patents and "trade dress" of Apple devices. This is not about the actual industrial design or a "quadrangular shape". The point is that Samsung has intentionally tried to produce device similar to Apple's. I therefore ride the wave of popularity of the iPhone and the ordinary people who form the majority, and to induce incentives to buy cheaper smartphone Samsung, which at first glance looks very similar.
The whole process actually shake the Samsung, but still not come to the most radical. Came a ban on the sale of any of its products. On the other hand, Samsung could still meet the "pub talk" about Apple and its shamelessness courts of štvrocovom tablet.
Apple actually tried the controversy several times before car food tray starting to settle out of court and sought from representatives of Samsung common ground car food tray very active. The fact that Apple in this case fought by more than just money and patents, recalled the official position of Apple.
Jury we are grateful for her service and hearing our story. We are glad that we can finally say it. Amount of evidence process showed that copying Samsung car food tray has gone further than we ourselves expected. Litigation between Apple and Samsung have always been about more than patents or money. They were about values. At Apple, we value originality car food tray and innovation and we put our lives into creating the best products in the world. We do it for the pleasure of our customers and not for blatant copying competitors. Thank court proceedings that Samsung recognized as intentional. Loud and clear thus made it clear that stealing is not.
Many weeks have elapsed closely watched case against Samsung in San Jose. We were shopping around the court reluctantly and after repeated asked Samsung to stop copying our work. This process car food tray was for us a little more than patents or money. It was about values. We value originality and innovation and we put our lives into creating the best products in the world. We do it for the pleasure of our customers and not for blatant copying competitors.
Jury we are grateful for her service and hearing our story. We are glad that we can finally say it. Amount of evidence process showed that copying Samsung has gone further than we ourselves expected.
Today's decision was not afraid car food tray to be taken as a victory for Apple, but as a lost American consumer. car food tray This decision leads to less choice in the market, less innovation and possibly higher prices. It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to make one firm acquired a monopoly thanks to the rectangle, rounded corners or technology that Samsung and other companies car food tray daily improving. Consumers have the right to choose and they know what they are buying when buying Samsung products. car food tray Has yet final word in this case or in court-led wars around the world, which were often rejected Apple's action. Samsung will continue inovovácii and offering customers car food tray choice.
Related Articles Apple and Samsung to try one last time to reach a compromise in the form of amicable agreement Apple offered Samsung license for iOS patents, Samsung refused What caused the dramatic change in the design of Samsung smartphones if not iPhone?
hmmm I do not know It's car food tray all weird and starts to be a little ... apple hater. I work at the cat from 93tieho, but their policy to not like it more and more. Samsung should be copied;) Star applacku advertising vs Microsoft (with a hammer). For me now to do so.
Have also prompt car food tray justice in our country, what the jury was super fast in the United States, we should long ago resolved all disputes. To the 700 professional questions answered in 21 hours, that they would, read, poruzumeli,

No comments:

Post a Comment